Archive for the ‘Google’ Category

Funny Google PR Fallout: Advertisers Requesting Posties To REMOVE Links.

Monday, October 29th, 2007

In the unexpected danger category: If you pay for links, you may find a few link sellers will refuse to remove them even if you ask! Seriously, the Postie Board thread started by SeeKim, a postie, who writes:

I just got an email from an advertiser wanting me to remove a post from September 13.

1. What would be the logic behind that?
2. Can I delete posts, and if so, how old do they need to be?

Why ask to remove the link?

Theoretically, the advertiser was walloped by Google for paid links, and is trying to correct the issue. They are now writing posties asking them to remove posts, as required to get Google to consider re-inclusion in search results.

Will Posties remove the links?

Probably. Few want to screw over their paying customers.

Still, the responses can be a bit funny. Here’s a tongue-in-cheek quip:

“*chuckle* . wonder if they would pay you to remove it Wink”

Ouch! And who is to say it’s entirely unfair?

Here’s a refusal:

[...] the say they don’t want links from blogs anymore. Well………..I’m a tough love bitty, and my post is good and I don’t delete content.

So, I guess if you pay for links in content, you may loseWeight Exercise control!

Two other posties suggest additional evil spins on the request:

A funny/evil thing to do would be to change the links to a competitor!

That would be a smarter choice, because if I was an evil competitor, I would nicely start emailing all the posties to get rid of the post of my competitor Twisted Evil

Which prompts at least three Posties to point out that such requests should be funneled through PPP. After all, how is the Postie to verify who is asking them to remove the links?!

Presumably, PPP will figure out a procedure to deal with these novel requests. Who’d a thunk this would happen? :)

Ten Google Page Rank Haikus

Friday, October 26th, 2007

An advertiser paid Venomous Kate to run a haiku contest mentioning Google. Naturally I entered! Then, I wrote more haikus.


Google Bomb Haiku
Dave Airey’s contest
created a Google bomb
then he diffused it.


Google vs. Andy Haiku
Google slapped Andy:
Sponsored posts are a no-no
even if they’re good.


Page Rank Zero Haiku
Google ranks dancing.
My page rank is still zero,
though I have back links.


‘Bot food Haiku
Content for people
that’s what Google says it wants.
(Don’t forget sitemaps.)


Zen Master Haiku
Does Page Rank matter?
Zen master, Maki, says no;
meanwhile, others fret.


Google Joke Haiku
Is page rank a joke?
Many bloggers are laughing;
others are sobbing.


Bad neighborhood Haiku
Vlad says don’t link me.
I’m in a bad neighborhood.
your rank could get slashed!


Nofollow Haiku
Blog with abandon!
But never post a paid link
(without nofollow.)


Google Page Rank Haiku
Google rules the net.
I watch my page rank tumble;
My tears fall like rain.


Matt Cutts Haiku
Matt Cutts of Google,
mysteriously silent.
Please, explain it all!

Who Doesn’t Love Daegan Spam? Or “Delete to Avoid a Google Penalty”

Wednesday, October 17th, 2007

Fantastic! Someone thinks my post is fantastic!! See?

Daegan wrote a fantastic post today on “Dear John Reese: Are Tampon Sample â

Admittedly, the author is a bit muddled about my name, but they dropped me a link. Isn’t that exciting?! …Well….No. I know if I leave the trackback, my blog risks a Google penalty!

That trackback will soon link into a “bad neighborhood”. If you read further, you’ll discover why out-link to bad neighborhood’s could cause Google’s algorithm to suspect a blogger of posting paid links resulting in Google penalty!

But first: How to identify “Daegan Spam”:

  1. A trackback will quote some of your post, nearly always attributing your words to someone else. I’ve been called “Daegan”, “AnnPlugged” and a variety of other names.
  2. Often, the “Blog” consists of nothing but very, very short quotes. They don’t violate copyright and won’t cause you duplicate content issues. This may lead you to shrug it off and permit the trackback.
  3. On some blogs — when the spam is fresh- the collection of links are sort of interesting.

    For example, today, a link lead me to a forum where someone advertised a LinkShield Link Protection, a service that will cloak affiliate links. That’s a type of product I might want to learn more about.

So, if you are aware of the danger, the spam is pretty easy to identify. Yet, it seems innocuous doesn’t it?

How could a link to that blog result in a Google penalty?

As the spammy trackback ages, the blog content becomes truly spammy. Idea Hustle, which originally left a trackback on my Duplicate Content Plugin, now redirects to a probably worthless paintball directory site, which could become anything in future.

If I leave this link in place and allow it to “follow”, I suspect I will soon be linking into into a site Google considers to fall in a “bad neighborhood”.

That’s bad for me because we know:

  1. Google’s algorithm examines what we link to determine our trust and page ranks.
  2. That paintball link look very spammy; after all, bloggers are often paid to link to these sorts of products.
  3. Google has been penalizing even very good sites for anything Google considers or suspect to be a paid link.

So, clearly we need to keep links like that off our blogs — especially if we “dofollow”. Luckily, the solution is easy!

Send “Daegen Spam” to Akismet!

Sending these to Akismet gets it of my blog, and also protects all blogs from this sort of spam.

Better yet, even if I miss one or two of these, I never actually give these places a dofollow. L’s Linky Love won’t give the follow until they drop at least 3 trackbacks. And after I get up date all my plugins (insert some cursing at WP here), I’m going to add a feature to LLL so I can periodically review sites that are currently “dofollowed”, that way, I can catch things retroactively. (I keep saying this… some day I’ll even do it! :) )